<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" version="2.0"><channel><title>David Orban's Blog - Latest Comments in Polished, and less than polished mobile phones and operating systems</title><link>http://davidorban.disqus.com/</link><description></description><atom:link href="https://davidorban.disqus.com/polished_and_less_than_polished_mobile_phones_and_operating_systems/latest.rss" rel="self"></atom:link><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:52:23 -0000</lastBuildDate><item><title>Re: Polished, and less than polished mobile phones and operating systems</title><link>http://www.davidorban.com/2009/08/polished-and-less-than-polished-mobile-phones-and-operating-systems/en/#comment-15209654</link><description>&lt;p&gt;There are reports of very many new Android based devices hitting the market in the second half of 2009. I will be curious to look at them, and see how both the hardware and the software evolve. Yes, multitouch support will be good! :)&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidorban</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:52:23 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Polished, and less than polished mobile phones and operating systems</title><link>http://www.davidorban.com/2009/08/polished-and-less-than-polished-mobile-phones-and-operating-systems/en/#comment-15206971</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Hi David&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I understand that the current version of Android supports multi-touch.  Would this added support affect your views about the HTC Magic (or an Android device generally)?&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">pauljacobson</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 15:50:38 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Polished, and less than polished mobile phones and operating systems</title><link>http://www.davidorban.com/2009/08/polished-and-less-than-polished-mobile-phones-and-operating-systems/en/#comment-15198481</link><description>&lt;p&gt;Yep, I very much agree with your points about openness and opportunity. So much so that I wanted to write about them. At the end I decided not to, because they are meta-considerations, which go beyond the intrinsic merits of each of the platforms.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As I mention I want to come back to this topic in a little while, and you can be sure that one of the criticisms against the iPhone will be its closed nature.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;An additional area that I didn't cover is the ease of development, or lack of, on each platform. And of course that also matters greatly. &lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">davidorban</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:30:56 -0000</pubDate></item><item><title>Re: Polished, and less than polished mobile phones and operating systems</title><link>http://www.davidorban.com/2009/08/polished-and-less-than-polished-mobile-phones-and-operating-systems/en/#comment-15197910</link><description>&lt;p&gt;I'm a big Android fan myself, and I actually agree with you on many of those points.  For me though, the biggest negative by far is the speed of the OS.  I find Android on the HTC devices is currently ridiculously slow.  I recently played with an iPhone 3GS and I was thinking to myself "ahhh, this is how a phone SHOULD react to my inputs".&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Though with all my negatives, I do still like Android more for a) it's future market potential is huge and I want to support that, b) I like supporting open source efforts, and c) I have more flexibility technically when it comes to unlocking, installing non-store apps etc.&lt;/p&gt;</description><dc:creator xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">Lee Chisholm</dc:creator><pubDate>Fri, 21 Aug 2009 12:17:03 -0000</pubDate></item></channel></rss>